Shams' Infinite Playlist of Quantum Sufi Madness

Friday, September 02, 2011 13:48 GMT
Al Iraqiya List MP Talal Al Zawbaai said on Thursday that his list and members of the National Alliance and Kurdistan Alliance will support Sdarist Bloc if it calls to conduct a censure motion. Zawbaai added that more than 180 MP are ready to outrun the heads of their blocs and to “destroy the idols that ripped the unity of the country.
Al Iraqiya MP Talal Al Zawbaai told Alsumarianews that more than 180 MP have their own plans and bid to surpass their blocs leaders and are ready to destroy the idols that ripped Iraqis and harmed Iraq unity. He also called members of the parliament to destroy these icons that are suffocating Iraqis and don’t want Iraqis to embrace light and freedom.
Zawbaai hailed Sadrist bloc call for a demonstration after the Eid in order to ask for better services in the country, stressing that Al Iraqiya will support Sadrist Bloc f it calls to conduct a censure motion. He added that not only Sadrist Bloc and, Al Iraqiya List will be voting but also Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq and a part of Kurdistan Alliance are not satisfied with the performance of the current government.
“All these blocs can make Maliki government lose the confidence motion and establish a new majority government far from the existing sectarian and political apportionment, a government that would encompass all the Iraqis. Zawbaai called MPs to constitute a strong and comprehensive bloc that would be capable of changing governments and answering the needs of the Iraqis.
In August 27, Sadrist Bloc said that censure motion is linked to which extent the government responds to the huge demonstrations to which Moqtada Al Sadr called in all Iraqi Provinces and towns after the end of Fitr Eid vacation and that in order to call for improving the services as the 6 months timeline the movement gave to the government ended.
Non-Governmental Organizations called in August 24, 2011 to crowded demonstrations in Tahrir Square and the provinces in September 9 in order to call Maliki government to resign. Sadr Movement stressed that the call to organize these demonstrations came after the end of the timeline that was given to Maliki government to resign and apologize for repressing the demonstrators. It also threatened that if the government doesn’t answer the demands the demonstrations will become a permanent sit in until their demands are met.

What will it mean if the Maliki government falls on the anniversary of 9/11?
Will it mean the terrorists have won?

Frank Rich says they have.
In retrospect, the most consequential event of the past ten years may not have been 9/11 or the Iraq War but the looting of the American economy by those in power in Washington and on Wall Street. This was happening in plain sight—or so we can now see from a distance. At the time, we were so caught up in Al Qaeda’s external threat to America that we didn’t pay proper attention to the more prosaic threats within.
In such an alternative telling of the decade’s history, the key move Bush made after 9/11 had nothing to do with military strategy or national-security policy. It was instead his considered decision to rule out shared sacrifice as a governing principle for the fight ahead. Sacrifice was high among the unifying ideals that many Americans hoped would emerge from the rubble of ground zero, where so many Good Samaritans had practiced it. But the president scuttled the notion on the first weekend after the attack, telling Americans that it was his “hope” that “they make no sacrifice whatsoever” beyond, perhaps, tolerating enhanced airline security. Few leaders in either party contradicted him. Bush would soon implore us to “get down to Disney World in Florida” and would even lend his image to a travel-industry ad promoting tourism. Our marching orders were to go shopping.